Comcast blasted for seeking “loopholes” in rule requiring disclosure of all fees.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    If your billing is too complicated to be accurately described to your customers, then you may have put yourself in a situation where you are incapable of being honest with your customers. That’s on you.

    It’s the job of regulators to ensure that you are honest with your customers; therefore, they can reasonably forbid you from having billing so complicated that it cannot be described accurately.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny, my local ISP tells me I owe X dollars a month and that’s what I pay. How on earth do they do that? Comcast is telling us it can’t possibly be that simple

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many companies, specially telcos, have a complex scheme of paid plans to confuse the users so that they become fed up and say “ok, so how much do I have to pay”. This is their exact objective.

        My local ISP (not a part of some huge elite ISP) is similar to yours. Pay X and you get unlimited internet for a month at Y Mbps uplink/downlink. Somehow it’s too complex for Comcast.

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heck, my ISP, which is a huge elite ISP, has a simple number too. You know why? There is competition in this market. I pay $80 a month for 1000/1000 fiber. That includes free HBO Max. Not as good as Sonic, but it’s a simple number.

  • k32481@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it is too hard/difficult for a company to itemize all their fees, they are charging way too many fees.

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They need to do a reset of their pricing them. Figure it out again from the ground up.

    I pay exactly what my isp advertises never a cent more.

    I live in a third world country.

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a simple solution, Comcast. Don’t charge any fee you aren’t willing to spend the effort to disclose.

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They will just have to create a fee to “cover the costs” of having to tell you what they are going to charge you.

  • Chris Koss@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think comcast getting fucked by regulators forcing fee disclosure has the potential to make a lot of people ‘too hard’

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m so glad I don’t have to use Comcast any more. A small local ISP (Sonic) expanded to cover my area last year and offers 10Gbps symmetric fiber for $40/month - half the price I was paying Comcast for 1.2Gbps down / 35Mbps up.

    • frostycakes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m super jealous. At least I’m moving to a new apartment with fiber from CenturyLink at it, but even they are running $70/mo for gigabit. I’m living the T-Mobile 5G home internet life right now because CL only has DSL at my current place, and fuck Comcast in general.

      Even worse is, the new place has honest-to-God fiber from Comcast to the unit–sadly paired with an RFoG converter, so despite it being more than capable of symmetrical gigabit, they still only offer 35Mbps up there. Leave it to Comcast to make FTTP suck.

  • SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s an easy fix, just don’t allow charging any fees that aren’t listed along with the advertised price. See? Very simple. They’ll figure out how to list them thereafter, believe in them.