• Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    How many people are smart enough to open an issue on GitHub but stupid enough to run code from a password-protected file in a random Mediafire link?

    • UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      GitHub is many things nowadays. Some people use it sort of like a blog where they can easily post long pages of text, sometimes it’s the first thing that shows up in the search results when you search for a computer/phone problem.

      I’m gonna sound old here but the younger generations are in general less computer literate than they were back in my day, and a lot of people have no qualms about downloading and running random exe’s from discord or mediafire.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, in my office, nobody had heard of dvorak (my keyboard layout), and they think I’m crazy for using vim. They don’t seem to understand how git actually works, and when I describe how compilers work, they think I’m speaking a foreign language. And these are people with years of SW development experience and CS degrees, a couple of them have masters.

        I’m older than many of them, but I’m not that old (millenial), yet I’m positive I knew all of this stuff back when I was at their point, as did most of my coworkers. Not sure if it’s a “kids these days” thing, or if I was just in a hacker-minded group earlier in my career, but I’m quite disappointed in the depth of technical knowledge SW devs have these days. Oh, and I hired most of them, and they were the better ones of the bunch I was presented with.

        To be fair, we’re a Python + JavaScript shop, but I still expect devs to be curious about how things work under the hood.

        • UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ok you might be a little crazy for using vim in 2024 :D but it depends on the context. Editing a quick config file from command line? Sure. Working on a big project? No way, give me an IDE with real navigation and auto complete functionality.

          I think part of the reason is just that the barrier to entry for software development continues to drop with IDEs, dependency/package managers, etc. It’s really easy to get a working knowledge of your tools without knowing how they really work under the hood, which is good and bad.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Vim can have “real navigation,” I have a plugin installed that lets me jump to method/class/variable definitions, and it works really well. The interaction is certainly different (IMO better, I just hit “gd” and I’m there), but I’m able to get the features my coworkers like from whatever IDE they have with a few minutes of installing a plugin and editing some configs.

            I’ve tried IDEs and editors, and honestly, I’m much more productive with my vim setup. Most of my time is spent reading and navigating code, and that’s really nice w/ Vim. To each their own, but everyone should master the tools they use, and I find myself having to help other devs with their own configs (e.g. the Python plugin by default in VSCode ignores most type errors, and we use optional types everywhere and they’re wrong more often than not…).

            So yeah, I’m pretty sad that many new devs these days don’t really understand their tools, and sometimes don’t even understand the platform they’re using because their IDE handwaves it away. I suppose that’s good for me as a senior engineer because I can provide value fixing the random issues the other devs can’t, but it does make me sad that maybe, just maybe, AI will have a chance at eliminating so many jobs because the average dev doesn’t dig much deeper than the average AI does. I’m not too worried about my job, but I am worried that I’m going to have to fire people because a machine is better at their job than them…

        • Ashen44@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The reaaon tech literacy has dropped so much is actually because we’ve gotten too good at UX. You don’t need to know nearly as much to do most things with computers now, so most people don’t bother learning about how to properly use a computer anymore. Setting up an email address or a router or a website has gotten significantly less complicated so the average person can do it without needing to learn any new skills. Hell, phones are so streamlined that most people probably don’t even realize their phone has a file browser.

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’d argue we haven’t gotten good with UX, we’ve gotten fancy with it. No way in hell many of the current popular stuff is good UX. But shiny sells

            Edit: spelling because typing on phones is shit

  • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ahh, was wondering what was up with those comments on an issue I made.

    Pretty much immediately got 2 comments with shady mediafire links in them.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I recently saw an entire org set up with individual repos that were clearly meant to be found in search results for stuff like “comparison tool” (I don’t remember my exact search). It would then lead to a repo that just had a license and readme. The readme would be a full readme that explained the software but linked elsewhere to get it. The link was clearly a malware or phishing attempt.

    • furikuri@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lmao. They couldn’t even copy code from a random MIT licensed project? Sometimes I think these scammers aren’t even trying