• Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    News flash: it’s not just ask Reddit. It’s Reddit entirely. That place is a shithole of bots.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah. That or niche subreddits that just aren’t popular enough to warrant bots. Like specific game communities. But even some of the big ones are full of bots.

  • DarkKnight_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 days ago

    A lot of the site feels like it’s been overrun by bots. The more niche communities seem to still be pretty good (and I do still enjoy engaging in them). But the subs like ask Reddit, Aita and the relationships one? Yea, it all feels like bs.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I stay away from any big subs now. The smaller stuff that tends to have 2 to 15 posts a day (like game specific subs) feel like they did before. Although I really feel a lot of those are going to discord as well.

      • DarkKnight_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yea same. Now that you mention that, gaming really is one of the only reasons I’m on there anymore. Destiny for example, still has a pretty active sub. But to your point, the couple discord groups I’ve joined over the past couple years are way better.

    • soapyplasm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      If only the niche communities over here were a bit more active. For instance, I’ve been hyperfixating on Tamagotchi, but there isn’t a Tamagotchi community here yet :(

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    the average redditor will still insist on appending “Reddit” onto Google searches since it “lets them see real human opinions” only because they can’t discern obvious botting from genuine human interactions

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      A lot of the botting is just copy and pasting previous actual human topics and comments though, so they’re not really wrong.

      Actual bot created content is pretty boring, and never “contributes” in a way that would make for a useful Google result. Your Google result may be a bot’s comment, but if that comment is answering a question of some kind there’s a 99% chance the comment was originally written by a human.

      • Morshveeneck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The content of bots (the desired ones) is at least not banned or removed by anyone. For example, I feel socially excluded by the Reddit and para-Reddit communities because whenever I write something a bit more controversial, it immediately ends up in the trash.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        copying and pasting a comment is still less genuine, since that promotes stale and outdated information. It can also create the false idea of a “widely held” opinion rather than a single person’s opinion copied a dozen times.

        • Morshveeneck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          promotes stale and outdated information. It can also create the false idea of a “widely held” opinion

          Clue

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well, obviously. But I don’t give a shit about that when I just want a solution to a problem.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The worst part is that they’re all really fucking bland questions. The shit you’d see on Facebook.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re engagement fodder designed to elicit human responses to provide a larger training dataset for future LLMs. That and to drive up Reddit usage and engagement numbers.

  • GingeyBook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve never understood what anyone gets out of hosting and spamming reddit with bots

    • Blaze@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Selling accounts with high karma to people wanting to push an agenda with a seemingly legit account

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      Conspiracy hat on:

      It’s done by Reddit themselves. They know user visits are dropping. They know power users have slipped. To avoid making it look like a desert, they have bots create content.

      Reddit’s origin story is sockpuppeting as users.

      They’ll do it again

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The difference between now and then though, is they were a private company.

        Unless they disclose they use bots to post content and make the site look active, any use of user count and engagement for any aspect of the company becomes fraud as its misleading investors.

        Oh we have 1 million posts an hour! Fraud.

        Oh we have 100 million monthly active users! Fraud!

        Investors Q/A - do you use bots? Answer No. Fraud.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Fraud doesn’t really stop a big company, if they can get away with it.

          Facebook for example.

          And whose to say it’s not them directly, but a “third party who Reddit pays for user acquisition” services?

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Q&A do you use bots to generate content or have you used any 3rd party that uses bots themselves directly or through another party.

            As long as its asked and it gets leaked they lied it’s fraud.

            Plausible deniability doesn’t work if proof comes out.

            You don’t hire a hitman and get off scott free when proof comes out you hired a hitman.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Conspiracy: Reddit sells bots and bot acquired analytics to high paying corpos, but are losing sales to secondary markets undercutting the reddit sold bots.

    • SGforce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mature accounts with some activity are worth money to people looking to AstroTurf political discussions.

    • OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I haven’t thought about Reddit since the mod ban but aren’t people being paid to make content? So could be mass farming nickels?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    remember when they banned bots on r/mademesmile or something and there were no posts anymore?

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If reddit hadn’t locked their API behind absurd paywalls, it would have been a cool project to try to make a browser plugin that gives accounts a “credit score” based on the factors you’ve been looking at, in order to let users quickly judge how likely an account is a bot.

    It could let people adjust the metrics it uses to calculate that score in the settings, so even if it becomes popular enough for bots to start trying to game the system, people can adapt their scoring metrics themselves and share config profiles that they think are more effective at rating bots.

    Might be something cool to see for activitypub/fediverse/lemmy accounts, but with the data available varying by instance it might be a little harder to calibrate a “catch-all” scoring config