Credit Andy Singer 2024

  • NOVA DRAGON@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This comic would have been just as effective–and less insulting–had they not included the explanation at the top; the graphic gets the point across just fine.

  • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So, if they kill in the name of God, why aren’t we calling them “terrorists” by now like we do with any other religious group, i.e. muslims … or … mhhhm… or… wait… do we call anyone else terrorists, besides muslims?

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The notion of a “promised land” is a lie humans tell to themselves to monopolise the resources we all share with all living things.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It also doesn’t make much sense in the particular context considering on a genetic level Palestinians are as Semitic as modern Ashkenazi jews. And it doesn’t make much sense from a religious stand point because modern Judaism differs from ancient Judaism by about the same amount as Christianity or Islam does. Modern Judaism just has this dogma that Ancient Judaism was secretly observing their form of it even though if we don’t take them at their word there isn’t a lot of evidence of that.

      So from a religious standpoint it doesn’t make a lot of sense. And from an ethnic standpoint it makes even less sense.

      And also we don’t let Europeans say “these are our ethnic lands” without calling them racist. So then why would we let people who are like 2% ethnic ancient jewish retroactively claim ethnic ownership of some land without calling them racist? They will claim it’s not about race and about religion. Ok, which is worse, a group of highly militant ethno-nationalists, or a group of highly militant theo-nationalists? Zionists are always one of two bad things and they will use arguments to play wackamole about which one to deflect the claims of one. Apparently if you are two bad things at once and it is unclear if you are both or just one of those things you get unlimited license to be both of those bad things.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    fun fact.

    The US army gave people ammunition for free if it was used to kill bison for a period of time.

    Bison almost went extinct.

    Bison were a source of food for the natives.

    I love american history!

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve met a guy who no shit said this to me as if it was a justification for Israel’s actions in Gaza.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anyone mentioning the phrase “3000” years ago is saying it. The Zionist movement is less than 150 years old. The rest of that history is made up.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s kind of disingenuous.

      It portrays Orthodox Jewishness as being responsible for genocidal Zionism when Orthodox Jewishness has pretty much always been vehemently critical of both Zionism and the creation of Israel.

      The Jewish Zionists that perpetrated the Nakba looked no different than their fellow Europeans.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a very important point, considering that the crux of all the white supremacist propaganda we’ve been fed about Israel rests on the idea that Israel (somehow) “represents” Jewishness… and I’d say this plays right into the hasbara’s hands.

  • Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is dumb propaganda on so many levels. Zionism isn’t a religious movement. Israelis are not primarily white. This equation is just dumb af

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d hope its to convince the government of Israel to get rid of corrupt leader Netanyahu, and to work towards an equitable two state peace agreement with an independent Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza.

      Or failing that, to convince people that unconditional support of the current Israeli government is bad, actually. Something many Israeli themselves believe (not to mention non-Israeli Jews).

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel like comparing murderers to other murderers wont swing any moderates to your side, but idk. If anything, making memes about genocide seems pretty dehumanizing.

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re not wrong in that if the Palestinian death toll hasn’t swayed someone already, they’re probably not going to be swayed.

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    The situation isn’t comparable. The majority of Jews in Israel are not European (or from anywhere else), they’re native Israeli and they trace their roots to Israel back for millennia.

    The problem is not that Israelis want to live there. They have a right to live there. The problem is that they’re depriving Palestinians of their right to live there instead of seeking peaceful coexistence.

      • s_s@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Arab counties shipped Jews to Palestine after they decided to kick them out of their own countries.

        Where are the Jews supposed to go?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Little thought expiriment for you: maybe segregating an entire class of people into one secluded corner of the world is fucking stupid? Maybe taking something that requires the murder of thousands or millions isn’t worth the price?

          • s_s@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            So you refuse to answer my question.

            Right.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              The answer, which clearly wasnt obvious to you, was literally fucking anywhere and everywhere including where they are now in Israel: just stop treating Palestinians like dirt and second class citizens and the problems will all go away with time.

              PM Rabin would have already sorted this shit out, but somebody had him killed and now all bets have been placed on Netan-fucking-yahu for some stupid fucking reason (for 2 decades at that).

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Zionism is a settler colonialism project that was able to really start with the support of British Imperialism. Zionism as a political movement started with Theodore Herzl in the 1880s as a ‘modern’ way to ‘solve’ the ‘Jewish Question’ of Europe.

          Adi Callai, an Israeli, does a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized by Zionism during its history.

          Since at least the 1860’s, Europe was increasingly antisemitic and hostile to Jewish people. Zionism was explicitly a Setter Colonialist movement and the native Palestinians were not considered People but Savages by the Europeans. While Zionist Colonization began before it, the Balfor Declaration is when Britain gave it’s backing of the movement in order to ‘solve’ the ‘Jewish Question’ while also creating a Colony in the newly conquered Middle East after WWI in order to exhibit military force in the region and extract natural resources.

          That’s when Zionist immigration started to pick up, out of necessity for most as Europe became more hostile and antisemitic. That continued into and during WWII, European countries and even the US refused to expand immigration quotas for Jewish people seeking asylum. The idea that the creation of Israel is a reparation for Jewish people is an after-the-fact justification. While most Jewish immigrants had no choice and just wanted a place to live in peace, it was the Zionist Leadership that developed and implemented the forced transfer, ethnic cleansing, of the native population, Palestinians. Without any Occupation, Apartheid, and ethnic cleansing, there would not be any Palestinian resistance to it.

          Herzl himself explicitly considered Zionism a Settler Colonialist project, Setter Colonialism is always violent. The difficulty in creating a democratic Jewish state in an area inhabited by people who are not Jewish, is that enough Palestinian people need to be ‘Transferred’ to have a demographic majority that is Jewish. Ben-Gurion explicitly rejected Secular Bi-national state solutions in favor of partition.

          Quote

          Zionism’s aims in Palestine, its deeply-held conviction that the Land of Israel belonged exclusively to the Jewish people as a whole, and the idea of Palestine’s “civilizational barrenness" or “emptiness” against the background of European imperialist ideologies all converged in the logical conclusion that the native population should make way for thenewcomers.

          The idea that the Palestinian Arabs must find a place for themselves elsewhere was articulated early on. Indeed, the founder of the movement, Theodor Herzl, provided an early reference to transfer even before he formally outlined his theory of Zionist rebirth in his Judenstat.

          An 1895 entry in his diary provides in embryonic form many of the elements that were to be demonstrated repeatedly in the Zionist quest for solutions to the “Arab problem ”-the idea of dealing with state governments over the heads of the indigenous population, Jewish acquisition of property that would be inalienable, “Hebrew Land" and “Hebrew Labor,” and the removal of the native population.

          Ethnic Cleansing

          Good Books on the History
          • Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History - Nur Masalha

          • The Concept of Transfer 1882-1948 - Nur Masalha

          • A History of Modern Palestine - Ilan Pappe

          • The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine - Rashid Khalidi

          • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine - Ilan Pappe

          • The 1967 Arab-Israeli War: Origins and Consequences - Avi Shlaim

          • The Biggest Prison on Earth: A History of the Occupied Territories - Ilan Pappe

          • The Gaza Strip: The Political Economy of De-development - Sara Roy

          • 10 Myths of Israel - Ilan Pappe (summery)

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Wdym sources? You want me to post links 100 year old documents pertaining to British Occupation of Palestine and subsequent League of Nations and later U.N. resolutions to move more Jewish people into Palestine? You need written accounts of the May 13th 1948 withdrawal of British Troops and May 14th establishment of Israel as the first “Jewish State” in 2,000 years?

          How about a source on POTUS Truman publicly acknowledging Israel 11 minutes after it was founded. “Some advisors felt that creating a Jewish state was the only proper response to the holocaust and would benefit American interests” according to TrumanLibrary.gov

          Why should I have to waste time educating your ass that can’t perform basic web searches?

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Right but this is a separate issue. My original comment was about Israelis whose families have been living in that region of the world for millennia. They have a right to be there. They are not equivalent to colonists from Europe arriving in the Americas.

            The Israeli government uses antisemitism as a weapon to attack their critics. They conflate criticism of the Israeli government with attacks on Jews. It’s bullshit, duplicitous rhetoric.

            But here we are conflating Israelis who can trace their ancestry to that region for millennia with (a minority of) European Jews who moved there during/after WW2, and calling all of them colonists. Now we are being duplicitous!

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It sounds like you’re describing a Secular One-State Solution with equal rights for both Israeli and Palestinian people, in the sense that both have the right to live there

              One or Two State Solution

              The settlements represent land-grabbing, and land-grabbing and peace-making don’t go together, it is one or the other. By its actions, if not always in its rhetoric, Israel has opted for land-grabbing and as we speak Israel is expanding settlements. So, Israel has been systematically destroying the basis for a viable Palestinian state and this is the declared objective of the Likud and Netanyahu who used to pretend to accept a two-state solution. In the lead up to the last election, he said there will be no Palestinian state on his watch. The expansion of settlements and the wall mean that there cannot be a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. The most that the Palestinians can hope for is Bantustans, a series of enclaves surrounded by Israeli settlements and Israeli military bases.

              • Avi Shlaim

              How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

              ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

              One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We [as in entire human population] can all convert to Judaism but it won’t ever change our ancestry. It’s just a religion.

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    Palestinians aren’t natives. they migrated at the same time as everyone else, 1 million people in 10 years.

    • Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, it was the only habitable parcel of land in the world with zero inhabitants until 1832. Jewish people and Palestinians both saw this weird chunk of land and realized they could just move there since no one else was there.

      • JoYo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        that’s exactly what happened… 1 million Arabs migrated in less than 10 years. whatever population was there before them was completely out numbered by the Arabs. the migration was 30x the increase seen at the same time the “baby boomers” were booming. that’s 30x population count, not 30x the percentage.

          • JoYo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            and they were replaced by more Arabs, follow along:

            Arabs can be both a victim and a perpetrator amongst themselves.

            crazy right?

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Or and this is nuts, but the Ottoman Empire was building up the area and urbanization was happening. Nobody got replaced, it was just more people moving in.

              • JoYo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                those are synonyms, or are we all pretending gentrification doesn’t exist again?