What does this mean, if anything? How would it be possible for a car company to be carbon neutral? Is this just nonsense/posturing since it’s so long from now?

  • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There will for sure be some “Creativity” with their numbers.

    “Carbon Neutral” will only apply to the manufacturing of the product, not the life of the product.
    It will probably also only apply to the assembly that is done in-house. It might not apply to things like the tires.

    It will also probably be done through some bulllshit “carbon credits”, which are about as honest and reliable as those “no, our $2 chocolate definitely didn’t use any child labour, and the farmers definitely aren’t paid slave-wages.” badges you find on foods.

    • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      Similar to how Subaru brags about their “zero landfill” production. Manufacturing a car absolutely generates waste. They just juggle the supply chain to have all the waste happen at their suppliers.

    • mysoulishome@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah this makes sense. Seems like they are trying to say Honda’s impact on the planet will be carbon neutral, which seems impossible.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Presumably by 2050 any new cars they sell will be electric. I don’t see anyone selling a ton of ICE cars at that stage except for niche applications (and they can easily spin that off into a different company if needed for carbon accounting purposes).

      • Dmian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Seeing at how bad Japanese car manufacturers are at producing good electric cars, and how they may be replaced by Chinese companies, maybe they mean they’ll be bankrupt by 2050… :P

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I wouldn’t say they’re bad at it, just playing catch-up after they bet on the wrong technologies.

          Toyota was the first to sell a usable hybrid back when BEV battery tech wasn’t there yet; Honda bet on hydrogen fuel cell tech.

          When it turned out everyone was going with the Tesla BEV concept, Honda and Toyota were already mid-development lifecycle with investments in technologies that didn’t make the cut.

          Now that those lifecycles are starting to wind down, we’ll see of they can leapfrog the current designs for BEVs to come up with the next big thing before China or Korea beats them to it.

    • Klanky@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      As someone who has a client who is an automotive OEM (I work with Customs and Imports), most of the parts are made by suppliers, who use parts from other suppliers, and barely anything is done in-house except maybe final assembly, so your comment totally tracks.

      It’s suppliers all the way down LOL.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      You assume they are even going to justify the bare minimum… it is so far in the future they are just hoping everyone will forget about it.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sorry, not an answer here, but a good analogy. It has a lot to do with creative accounting and making up definitions.

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    They can, when they limit CO2 emissions as much as possible and compensatw for the remaining emissions by planting trees and other tricks.

    Also, ‘being carbon neutral’ can mean several things:

    • ensure the company doesn’t produce CO2 (net)
    • ensure the company and the commute of the employees doesn’t produce CO2 (net)
    • … plus suppliers
    • … plus transport of the goods produced

    And so on,… it all is just how you define it.

    My house is the greenest in the neighbourhood and probably in the country. That it has nothing to do with being eco friendly but more with the paint on it is just a minor detail. ;)

    • ISometimesAdmin@the.coolest.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thank you for actually attempting to answer the question instead of just spouting the knee-jerk reaction of “it’s bullshit”.

      And yes, maybe it is bullshit. Maybe they’ll never end up actually offsetting their carbon footprint. Maybe they’ll think they are, but end up getting scammed out themselves. Last Week Tonight did a great piece on Carbon Offsets on that whole subject.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s like Micheal Scott yelling “AND WE’RE GOING CARBON NEUTRAL!!!” at the stock holders meeting.

  • Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    How would it be possible for a car company to be carbon neutral?

    By only using carbon neutral energy in their manufacturing? Car companies are really not special in that regard.

    I’m not saying that’s going to happen and that they aren’t posturing. But like there is no fundamental mystery to the “how”.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      And the carbon credits are basically some scammer that promises to plant some trees somewhere remote where nobody can actually check.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Carbon compensation like reforestation

    Energy from green sources for their factories

    No more gas cars also helps a whole lot if they calculate over the car’s lifetime vs a gas car

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Same way phone manufacturers are aiming to be 100% green by passing off all the blame to the client. “We may have made it impossible for you to change the battery once it’s fuck but it was your choice to throw the phone in the bin”

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Seems like you missed their other commercial where they said they’d start a nuclear Armageddon in 2049

  • jafffacakelemmy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, it’s nonsense. In 2050 if they aren’t carbon neutral, they haven’t broken any laws so there’ll be no punishment. So why not announce lofty goals?

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is not impossible for people at Honda to care. Just not the right people, those that can actually make a difference. The decision makers are all looking for what gives them the most profit, if not then they are not in their position long or, really, never get to a position that matters in the first place.

        The only thing that capitalism cares about is profit, by very definition.

        • skulblaka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Therefore it is up to consumers to make sure that being environmentally conscious is profitable.

          I was going to buy Hondas anyway because they are cheap and reliable but if Honda as a company really does become carbon neutral that’s an added bonus that I’m thrilled about. Even if Hondas become moderately priced and reliable instead of cheap and reliable as a result, they’ll still be on my radar.

          • nous@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You counter your own point…

            You cannot trust people to do what is right for the environment. They wont do anything until they see the effects for them selves and by then it is far too late to do anything meaningful. And if/when they do finally care all they see is a lot of green washed campaigning by every company claiming to be green when non of them are and they have no real choose and a lot of confusion. You need strict and effective regulation to curve this behavior in companies.

            • MxM111@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You cannot trust people to do what is right for the environment

              Until we get our AI GPT overlords, people is all we’ve got.

  • peastea@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    While it’s a different company I think Bosch as an automotive supplier can serve as an example on how this can be calculated as they are already “carbon neutral”.

    https://www.bosch.com/sustainability/environment/

    At present, we use carbon credits to offset residual CO₂ emissions, such as from combustion processes (heating, process heat). In addition, we refer to carbon credits to offset electricity sourced in countries with only limited availability of green electricity. As we make progress with levers 1 to 3, we want to gradually reduce the share that we offset to achieve carbon neutrality to no more than 15 percent by 2030.