I have spent a couple years badmouthing this dude, but the police bodycam footage is pretty crazy. It’s also crazy to me that a bunch of Miami cops would pull over one of the city’s most well-known athletes and nobody was like “gee, maybe we shouldn’t go so hard on this one, he’s famous”

Check out Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble. One of the best books I’ve read on the subject

That article is pretty different. It barely touches on the kneejerk reaction from the right, which is the point of OP’s article. It doesn’t get in depth with voters at all, tbh.

If you wanted an article discussing the facts of drug smuggling, yes, your article is short, sweet, and to the point. However, all of that content AND MORE is included in the original, since the point of the original is how people have shifted right on drug policy, despite there being no evidence for Trump’s statements.

I’m a little confused as to how the title makes Trump sound good. Facts are facts.

Instead of downvoting because you think the title makes the article pro-Trump, people should actually read the article

There’s a really good Dick pun to be made as a follow-up joke here, I just can’t think of it

You know it’s bad when the person who makes everything into a joke admits that it’s fucked

I read a lot of fucked up news stories, but this one is one of the wildest in recent memory

What most people don’t realize is that childhood vaccinations don’t actually last forever. It’s been probably 30 years since I completed most of my vaccinations as a toddler, but when I got my most recent job (at a healthcare provider), they tested me and I needed boosters for some childhood vaccines due to losing immunity.

If you have a HYS, there is no reason to have 100k in an account earning .05%.

Like others have said, everything else depends on your risk tolerance. If you’re young, you should have more in higher risk stuff (stocks, etc.). Even if you have a big loss, you can earn it back.

Whatever you don’t need liquid and whatever isn’t in high-risk investments can go into stuff like bonds and CDs

They’re in our blood and even in our brain?

There are a number of feminist communities on Lemmy that you’re welcome to join, although I doubt you’ll get very far with arguments that were addressed in the 1990s

Yup, thanks. Fixed

Well TIL what DINK means. As another DINK household (unless you count the dogs), I have literally never been judged or had a confrontation about this.

Sure, almost all of my friends have kids now, so the nature of our relationships have changed. But I don’t think it’s necessarily in a bad way.

Think of noise as a sine wave on a Cartesian plane (the X-y graph you used in math class). The noise goes up and down so that y=1 at the max and y=-1 at the minimum.

What happens if we add 1 when y=-1? Well, now it’s 0. And what happens if we add -1 when y=1? It’s 0 again. That’s basically what noise cancelling does. It adds the “opposite” to make the sound equal 0. That’s super layman’s terms, but I hope it makes sense. It’s basically trying to make the opposite of whatever it hears.

But when something is physically touching your body, your ears can’t absorb that “opposite” sound because the original sound is kind of already absorbed in your body, if that makes sense?

Ha. This guy hasn’t heard of nukes

There’s an alternate timeline where he wins and can’t get anything through because there aren’t enough progressive Dems in the senate.

The other thread was an attempt to gauge feedback on specific ideas (as this post mentions, they are so in the works) and it precipitated this post

Honestly, the bias piece was never the important piece for us. It was the credibility piece.

Just trying to give some insight into why we used it in this community.

The last sticky thread actually had some really good feedback, like using a fact checker that is part of the International Fact Checking Network (of which MBFC is not a member) and many other similarly great suggestions.

One of the issues might be in the name. We don’t want to create a bias bot. That seems like a fool’s errand, which is one thing we learned in the process of implementing the MBFC bot. We want to create something that makes people aware of posts that are from medium to low quality sources. Obviously, if the source is super sketchy, we’d delete it, but there’s a lot of grey area where we leave things up.

Just FYI, they agreed