Uh, the Pro wasn’t aimed for that, you twit.

And for 500 it’s getting even better than all other options next month.

This is the dumbest take on what’s happening. The Quest 3 is better than the Pro and it comes out next month. We don’t need the Pro anymore. Some of y’all need to use some critical thinking. Roblox also just recently got a lot of attention towards it from Meta; it’s not a coincidence these were Roblox devs that the Pros were given to.

Honestly, if I had any stake in them I’d be wondering why Unity is so desperate for money.

It’s not just “the only difference,” it’s the entire point. The population’s data being through the CCP is the entire government consideration of banning the app.

At Meta we have a massive system for cutting out our net effect on water for the local area. I’m in NM and the DC here is almost actually adding to the water. I can’t imagine Microsoft would behind as to not do this. It’s an open design.

If they thought that far ahead they wouldn’t be running around breaking into homes and cars.

What idiots upvoted this?

Weird how everyone jokes how shitty Bethesda developers are but everyone’s surprised how bad Starfield runs.

The difference is that you only pay for an artist’s picture once.

I don’t feel bad for anyone pushing a subscription model.

“Units being sold for permanent living than being bought to rent out days at a time will cause a housing shortage.” lol

People who aren’t living in their home will lose the home to eviction? Listen to my violin.

It’s so fucking obnoxious the way people try to make outlier situations as if it invalidates the argument. You know god damn well the situations you’re describing are an extremely tiny percentage of airbnb usage (honestly if any at all). Don’t be daft.

Uh, no one said that, dude.

I did my annual reimage and it’s always jarring having to put everything back on lol.

If I need to pay a news company every time I decide to text you a link to their site because I thought it was interesting, I’d stop linking to them too.

I mean, that argument could work both ways right?

deleted by creator

No it’s not. If that one person crashed twice after 500 trips and everyone else is crashing once after 200 trips, I’m still taking the person whose average crashes is more than two times less often.