• Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, on the other hand, a 5 year old is generally more fragile than an adult man.

    • rdyoung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Have you never met a kid? Were you never a kid? The kids that scream and cry over small bumps do it because that’s how they were taught to get attention and the adults feed that.

      Kids are (biologically) way more resilient than adults. Their bones are more rubbery and slowly harden over time.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’ve always thought that humans should just evolve to be smaller now that we’re so smart. We’d need less food, people would be safer in impacts, we could build smaller and more efficient homes, etc. Think of the efficiency of a space program where each astronaut was 1/3 the weight and half the size!

        It’s not like we have any natural predators any more, so size isn’t a big deal.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Small bumps are not the same as a vehicle crash. There’s a reason young children can’t sit in the front seat, because air bags deploying can kill them. Kids are small and flexible enough to have an advantage with lower impact stuff, but for high impact stuff they’re smaller and squishier and that extra flexibility doesn’t help as much, and once they hit puberty they mostly lose that because of the reduced cartilage in their skeletons. Younger children are especially vulnerable to head and neck injuries because of their less developed muscles.

        • rdyoung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Please stop.

          You’re arguing about something I didn’t say. I was responding directly to the point about kids being fragile. As you say kids have a major advantage in smaller crashes for similar reasons as to how/why the highly intoxicated can sometimes walk away seemingly without a scratch. If a crash is bad enough to kill a kid, good chance the driver isn’t walking away from it either.

          As for kids sitting in the front seat, yes, airbags kill but pre airbags the kid would also be more likely to go through the windshield and that’s also why smaller kids are buckled in facing the back of the back seat, so they have extra protection from the seat they are in. There is also the whole seat belt nit fitting right in the front or back seat and that’s why we have them in something up to a certain weight class. It’s not about age, it’s about height and weight.

          Seriously, stop. I didn’t say anything about kids not needing seat belts or other protective measures. I was simply countering something that was definitely not accurate.

    • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah. They’re made ot of rubber. They’ll be fine. Anyway, even if they aren’t, it’s not like society invested too much in them yet.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Children are objectively small and squishy. Car accidents are one of the leading causes of death for children for a reason.