I honestly do not mind it one but. I quite like the interface. It’s minimal but there are some bugs to it which is to be expected. I really do like the overall design of it though. There isn’t too much going on. It’s like old Reddit which I am a big fan of
4- You signed up for a decentralized service that advertises the lack of a central authority, to leave a central authority, and now you’re complaining there’s no central authority.
This isn’t Reddit, and it’s not designed to be a Reddit clone. There are people working on 1 for 1 clones, and it’s totally fine if you want that, but maybe you should find one of those instead of demanding the people who built a specific platform with a specific vision immediately ditch all of that to cater to Reddit exiles.
I didn’t demand anything; I just made a criticism. There’s a difference.
I’m fine with there being no central authority for servers; I just wish there was a central authority for subs, like there is with Usenet, which has no central authority for servers, but it has a central authority for groups carried by the servers. Without one, the user base gets fragmented pretty quickly.
A- I’ve seen a few community browsers pop up, you can find one in most intro threads and there’s also a built in explorer.
B- That’s the entire point