Jens Stoltenberg says Nato ‘ready and able to defend all allies’, after Trump invited Russia to attack member countries

A White House spokesperson put it the best, I think:

The White House spokesperson Andrew Bates, when asked about Trump’s comments, said: “Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged – and it endangers American national security, global stability and our economy at home.”

What’s so insane about all this is that Trump saying something like that out loud means it’s now practically gospel to the vast majority of GOP voters, and might as well be official party policy.

  • stephen01king@lemmy.zipEnglish
    534·
    9 months ago

    Being able to supply another country with weapons and ammunition while keeping enough stock for your own military is not the definition of a self-sufficient military, though?

    • nevemsenki@lemmy.worldEnglish
      723·
      9 months ago

      If we were able to succesfully do so, I would agree with that. We aren’t succeeding in supplying enough to keep Ukraine in the game right now, though.

      • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
        311·
        9 months ago

        The point is that having any ammo left over for Ukraine at all – let alone “enough” – is literally the definition of more than self-sufficient.

        • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          512·
          9 months ago

          If you use 0 bullets in a hot-war of your own, but can’t provide a wartime amount to another country with the help of allies that means you cannot provide enough for yourself during a true homeland crisis.

          Euroland focused too much on social services and allowed their military production capabilities to rust because big daddy USA would always be there with the largest MIC on the planet.

          Well, somebody just went to the gas station for cigarettes. Good luck.