A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hamas colonial resistance was probably one of the most targeted in all of history with a 33%+ soldier kill rate. But of course nothing is good enough for those that demand absolute perfection from angry people in a concentration camp.

    What the fuck

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You have fun with your 66% civilian murder rate. Literally worse than the US carpet bombing Japan into oblivion, but I’m sure Hamas soldiers on the ground are way less capable of discerning between civilian and soldier than WW2 pilots literally aiming for civilians.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Can you cite a source for that claim?

            For the bombings in WW2 having a better soldier-civilian kill ratio than Hamas?

            Here’s a fun recent one of America having a 300% higher civilian casualty rate than Hamas:

            Are you fucking kidding me? If you go to the actual source, the Intercept (not Huffpo) cites an example in which 35 deaths out of 200 were of targets during Operation Haymaker - Operation Haymaker primarily targeted Taliban posts, not some fuckers in the streets, and engaged targets of opportunity during many of the strikes. Independent sources often point out that the civilian casualty figures of drone strikes are off by almost an order of magnitude from what the US government claims. That is to say, 15-20% instead of .2%-2%

            Which is worse?

            1 civilian killed for every 4 soldiers killed?

            Or 2 civilians killed for every 1 soldier killed?

            Must be the one that says “Hamas good!” and the appropriate buzzwords du jour.

            Here’s the UN in 2022:

            Ninety Per Cent of War-Time Casualties Are Civilians

            That’s not even fucking close to being relevant to the civilian casualty ratio of a military force, unless you think fucking Israel is more moral than the average war right fucking now.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              I have no idea what your comment is even supposed to mean. Are you claiming Huffpost and the UN are all lying?

              Do you think israel has a better civilian casualty ratio than Hamas when >70% of the people israel kills are women and children?

              Going to be hard to beat Hamas on the civilian casualty front when literally every single male israel kills would need to be Hamas to have the same civilian casualty ratio as Hamas

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                If you want to ramble on without bothering to read my points, you’ll have to do it without me.