Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • vivadanang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    they could repurpose those buildings (difficult but possible) to dwellings, which would revitalize the downtown businesses - but no, they’ll hold out desperately for a return to office that, if it was going to happen, would have happened already.

    Meanwhile, there ain’t enough housing. Everyone pays more and the core rots.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The storefronts being talked about are already zoned mixed use, it’s really just the first floor street side storefronts that are barren, with residential apartments 2nd floor on up.