I think we all owe The Marvels an apology…

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    Audience score ratings for the sequel of a well received film. People are giving a score based on a higher expectation going in compared to the original. The bigger they are the harder they fall sort of thing.

    I’m just speculating. And still hopeful I might enjoy it, though I’m not a huge fan of Lady Gaga

  • Rei@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    CinemaScore also gave these scores:
    Catwoman: B The Crow (2024): B-
    Madame Web: C+
    Batman & Robin: C+
    Morbius: C+
    Fantastic Four (2015): C-
    Borderlands: D+

    They seem really generous with their scoring

    • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They seem really generous with their scoring

      CinemaScore polls audiences and presents that data in the form of an A to F rating. They don’t do subjective ratings or reviews. The score is intended to be a measure of the average audience sentiment to a film.

      • Rei@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, I read that on there; I guess I should have said the audiences they polled are really generous with their scoring

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I’ve just seen it. It’s better than the reviews would suggest, but it’s not without flaws or quirks.

      If you went into it expecting ‘more of Joker 1’ in terms of a straight, by the numbers sequel, you might very well come out disappointed. And there’s no denying that there’s a lot of singing in it, which inherently puts some people off. But if you’re willing to have an open mind, there’s a lot to love here.

      I’ve seen terribly reviewed movies that I loved and well reviewed movies that I’ve hated. At the end of the day, it’s all someone else’s opinion anyway.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      First one was depressing. Awfully depressing. It was poignant and well done but I can’t rewatch it because I have to gear up to be ready for it.

      The second one is a musical. I’m not sure anyone is ready for that after the first one.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s weird. I watch the first Joker like three times so far. Haven’t seen the second. Now, Requiem for a Dream, that’s a hard watch for me.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      First film was a great film if it were new IP, but a shit joker batman film. The second film was always likely to be shit, because they were always going for abstract and avant garde artistry without a clear connection to the underlying and far stronger story and IP people are expecting. I’m sure it’s a beautiful film and musical, but it’s dog shit attached to joker.

      • ryan213@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I didn’t even view the first as anything related to Batman. Just a standalone movie to me.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s what it was supposed to be, a gritty disconnected story about what a more realistic take on a joker would be, don’t think batman or super heroes was supposed to be in either one, not sure where that commenter is coming from.