• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You seem to be misunderstanding my position entirely. I suggest you read my first comment again. Cause you’re using a lot of words and details to explain useless stuff.

    Edit: I don’t disagree it’s a tool. I disagree its the same as a person being inspired by others. And I am against the claim that they should freely use whatever they want without credit.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no such thing as a truly unique idea. Everything is a result of combining concepts and experiences in different and novel ways.

      AI doesn’t freely use anything in a reproduction type of format. It can’t regenerate a copy of a work It is no different that human awareness of a subject. Restricting this type of awareness is the same as the thought policing nonsense of humanity’s past eras of stupidity. No court will ever restrict this type of information and access. If they did I could sue someone for their thoughts. This is draconian nonsense.