• Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude wrote a memo telling everyone just how fucking evil we are and tried to hide it. They then got caught and try play off that he was cosplaying an evil villain from a movie. What a fucking joke. I hope Google gets broken up along with Amazon.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The antitrust law need to be refreshed and have teeth put back, it isn’t just those two that need splitting.

    • Nobody@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should all be lined up and shot. <— That’s not me saying it. It’s a parody from a movie about someone fed up with the late stage capitalist hellscape this world has become.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude wrote a memo telling everyone just how fucking evil we are and tried to hide it. They then got caught and try play off that he was cosplaying an evil villain from a movie.

      Do you have a source for it being a legitimate memo? I get that the message is embarrassingly close to the truth, but if what you say is true, they’d be committing perjury - which would get them into even more trouble.

    • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is so evil about what was written in the document? To me it just sounded like the guy was bragging about their dominance.

      • EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The drug and cigarette analogy is dramatic, but the real heat is going to come from the claim that they only care about the supply side of the equation, not demand. In other words, their audience is locked in and has no power, and the ad suppliers (Google themselves) set the market conditions.

        That is dangerously close to monopoly talk.

        • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeha, that’s monopoly talk. I guess I was expecting something else when I read “evil”.

          I don’t really think people are locked-in by any means, there are so many alternatives. People just prefer Google because it provides the best search results and they don’t care about privacy. The alternatives are pretty good, but people just want the best. I usually have to go back to Google to query something whenever DDG isn’t providing good results.

          Before downvoting, at least explain why people are locked-in. Aren’t there alternatives to Google? They are definetely creating a horizontal monopoly by acquiring all the companies in the chain, from advertisers to operating systems… but there are alternatives to Google (the search engine). I use DDG everyday, how am I locked-in to Google? I’m not arguing against the monopoly, I’m arguing against the lock-in.

          • spudwart@spudwart.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Google funds Mozilla, And nearly all non-firefox browsers are chromium based, which means google gets to set the standards of the web.

            Android is a similar story, many forks may have removed google from the equation, but google makes a decision regarding android, and it will shake all forks downstream from it.

            The others really aren’t that concerning because there are real alternatives to them.

            But Google’s AdSense might be the one that gets them in the end.