• tugash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    How’s the genocide of a whole continent “average history”? The magnitude of destruction in the Americas is not common and this downplay of a continent-wide genocide is annoying.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there are other examples of continent wide genocide.

      Humans are the fucking worst and it isn’t unique to one area

      • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        because there are other examples

        …ok? I guess I don’t get why there needs to be any comparison, since it inevitably ends up sounding like “oh, well this one wasn’t as bad as that one. Happens all the time.”

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m suggesting that across history IS common.

          I’m not celebrating it.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Other examples existing does not change that it is historically unprecedented and far from the norm. And its just a really strange and pointless thing to point.

        Person A: “my dad died in a car bomb” Person B: “ehh, average family death” A: “uhh what?” B: "well, there are other examples of people dying in car bombs, dude! "

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The root comment was “average history”. I replied to someone suggesting it wasnt, and disagreed with them.

          To use your analogy,

          "My dad died of old age.

          What? That’s insane no one dies of that.

          No, it’s pretty normal"

          • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re correcting me saying that expelling native populations time and time again from every land they go to, then genociding their entire population to the point of near extinction, using the most horrific methods and over centuries, is more akin to dying of old age than dying by a bomb?

            Please read that again and confirm to me that’s what you’re saying, because it sounds absolutely ridiculous. This scale and this horror are not common historical occurrence.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s correct, humans have used the cutting edge methods to drive out and destroy native populations in the name of expansion, for thousands of years.

              I’m not celebrating it.

              • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I am sorry to restate this again, but the expulsion, genocide on the scale (both in size and horror) is historically unprecedented. You’re going to have to prove this to me if you think it’s a common occurrence instead of continuing to repeat it.

                And for the record, no one here is talking about small scale expulsion. I am talking about expulsion AND genocide on the same scale and horror committed here. Show me that it is a common occurrence and I will concede.

      • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did they? I was under the impression they came in, did a conquer, and basically left with the conquered understanding that the horde’d be back for their tribute.

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah they obliterated smaller outside towns to scare the bigger cities into giving them shit. They killed a lot but I’m not sure it counts as genocide since the eradication of people wasn’t the point.

          • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Tell that to the something like 50 million people they killed while doing so.

            You have to be deeply ignorant, or some kind of idiot, to give the Mongols a pass while condemning western Europeans.

            • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not giving anyone a “pass” to genocide, only attempting to be very clear about what the precise definition of it is.

              Everyone killing people for their stuff sucks, but humans were doing that shit forever.

              Not every generation was loading specific people into trains and camps just to gather them for removal from the genetic code.

    • TheDankHold@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because you’re lumping in the unavoidable disease transfer of first contact with intentional conquest and violence. Take away that, which was going to happen whenever any Afro-Eurasian community first interacted with people from the americas, and you get a very comparable situation to many things throughout history.

      • tugash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        The genocide didn’t happen solely after the first contact, the massacre of natives lasted centuries. Many nations were wiped out in the XIX century.

        And a quote for you

        Proponents of the default position emphasize attrition by disease despite other causes equally deadly, if not more so. In doing so they refuse to accept that the colonization of America was genocidal by plan, not simply the tragic fate of populations lacking immunity to disease.

        Professor Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s strong evidence the disease was on purpos- Ah who am I fucking kidding, the colonizers flat out admitted it.