Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Factual reasons for this please. Besides the horrible, privacy braking, AI stuff, what can photoshop do that gimp can not?

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are professional you use what your colleagues are using. You can’t have 8 people in photoshop and 1 person in Gimp. You are not going to get a studio to flip over to gimp if they are a Photoshop house because it will cost a lot of time and money. Especially not larger operations.

      Individual freelancers? Sure. Industry capture? Way more difficult.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Collaboration with other Adobe users? Same thing with Office. If one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow. Once you’ve to collaborate with others who use Windows/Mac it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Factual will be relative, and no matter what I say you’ll find a way to turn this into a fight.

      What other apps compete with photoshop besides gimp?