• deur@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like you’re part of the group they’re protecting if you refuse to understand and value the need for permission management ;)

    Unlucky!

  • bjorney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so every app can only read it’s own subfolder. Unless you think it’s better that advertisers and app developers can have access to 100% of your personal files

    • oldGregg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish I could at least create a folder on my microSD card for these apps but no.

    • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      You joke but those and helmet laws all should be repealed. We need to stop protecting people from Darwin. When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

      We see the results of this in modern society with the number of iPhone owners. No one should want an iPhone but marketing is all it takes for the stupid to be convinced.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

        And yet … here you are.

        • qfjp@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only because he’ll get a ticket if he’s caught not wearing his seatbelt.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        …until you’re personally involved in a fatal accident—even if by no fault of your own—where the other party would have survived. Post traumatic stress is no joke. I don’t think we should aspire to have a society with more suffering.

        • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol. Forcing people to do your bidding just ‘in case’ someone dies in your vicinity. What a tyrant.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The argument I’ve made is that I don’t wish to personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death. We don’t allow others to inflict harm in other ways, and this is in my opinion no different. It has nothing to do with tyranny.

            • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, you’ve demanded other people restrict themselves so that you are spared the ‘chance’ of “personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death”.

              Pretending your demands have no consequence on others isn’t a valid defense. It’s pure selfishness expressed as tyranny.

              • poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What an absolutely absurd position you’ve chosen to take on this. I can only hope for the sake of compassion that this is not what you actually believe.

                • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  "Forces others to do their bidding and draws on ‘compassion’ to justify it. "

                  Narcissism defined folks.

  • Keith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just curious, as a rooted phone user is there any way to force this to allow you to use downloads?

    • Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is downloads folder not important? For most people this is literally the biggest folder of files containing everything they ever downloaded, and it may also include downloads from messengers, e.g. Whatsapp and Telegram.

  • Placid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH APP PERMISSIONS. IF YOUR APP NEEDS A PLACE TO READ/WRITE FILES, IT MAKES SENSE TO KEEP IT OUT OF YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER THAT COULD CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION LIKE BANK STATEMENTS OR OTHER THINGS. YOU DON’T WANT SOME RANDOM APP LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THAT ENDS UP IN YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER!!!

    GET RILED ABOUT GIVING THESE GREEDY DATA SNOOPING APPS THE LEAST PERMISSION POSSIBLE!!

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The mildly infuriating part of this post is OP thinking that his consumer phone OS was made just for them and not millions of tech-illiterate people.

    • glibg10b@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand the security implications, but I think I should at least have a say about what happens on my own phone

      The app in question is popular and open source. My SD card’s downloads folder is also unused and empty, as you can see. There is absolutely zero risk here

      • Nusm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But…… if you’re allowed to install into the downloads folder, then it wouldn’t be unused and empty…… ?

        Is this Schrödinger’s file system?

        • Illiterate Domine@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          OP isn’t trying to install into the downloads folder; they’re trying to grant an app access to the downloads folder to read and write data.

          • Nusm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But… if they write data into that folder, it wouldn’t be unused and empty… ?

            Maybe I’m misunderstanding something here?