• will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    11 months ago

    Their “how it works” blog article is worth a read - they’re using a blackbox reverse engineering of the protocol (called PyPush) and re-implementing it natively in an android app, so there are no man-in-the-middle servers. It’s pretty bonkers given how difficult Apple’s spec-less tech can be to work with.

    • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And Apple will work tirelessly, and litigate endlessly, to stop this from happening.

      • thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve been using Beeper for almost two years now on desktop to view my iMessages, discord, and slack all in one app, and Apple hasn’t said or done shit about it yet

        • snowe@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s not the same. Beeper mini uses reverse engineering, beeper just uses Mac minis sitting in a datacenter somewhere.

          • jo3shmoo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Per the Beeper CTO, evidently Beeper (cloud) isn’t using the Mac minis anymore for anyone who migrated to their latest bridge. It’s using the same solution, they just didn’t make a big deal out of it at the time. I’ve actually been on the new bridge since early November and haven’t had any issues. In my case the new bridge fixed an issue I was having with SMS forwarding from my iPhone.

      • EliasChao@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I read somewhere that RE for the sake of improving communications is allowed, or something along those lines.

        • accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Reverse engineering for the sake of ensuring compatibility. It’s not limited to communication.