What’s that noise? I’m sure I heard something.
-Last recorded words of Rodney Jenkins before he was attacked by Howard the Duck
I know it’s not the point of the article but seeing a person in a trench/ditch with no reinforcement and no slope makes me so nervous.
That’s a bad way to go if it collapses.
https://www.osha.gov/trenching-excavation
The more I look at it the more it may not be quite 5 feet requiring it. Here’s hoping so.
The Chaser by John Collier… that ending … still gives me chills
I think you misunderstand.
Here’s an example. It has the math but doesn’t require that you “know” how to work the formulas or equations.
Because he’s doesn’t require that you know the math. He shows it, explains it, and visualizes the concept.
Quantum Mechanics 1b - Birth of the Quantum II
I can’t remember which video it was but in one he explains about how Einstein was shown that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was related to relativity in a series of letters. At which point Einstein conceded the point.
All this was done showing the equation… and then shifting the pieces around and explaining what they were. Until at the end what was left… was e=mc^2.
Edit: It was this video but I misremembered. It uses Einsteins equations to prove the uncertainty principle
Quantum Mechanics 3b - Probability and Uncertainty II
My point isn’t that the math isn’t there. It’s just that you’re not dropped into a video with here’s a formula… solve it and you’ll see why XYZ is true. The equations themselves are explained, visualized, etc.
If there’s a concept such as bell curves he shows that without requiring you do the numbers by showing how random motion will lead to certain probabilities over others.
Check this out
Quantum Mechanics 1a - Birth of the Quantum I
And then compare to this next episode in the series
Quantum Mechanics 1b - Birth of the Quantum II
And this later one. Where he gets more and more into the mathematics. But you’re not just thrown into the deepend at the start
It’s not at all. I’m saying it was good then and it is now.
It’s gotten heavier and more technical but that’s because as it goes on you learn and it gets deeper. And yet they still find a way to make it accessible even though they’re obviously still only scratching the surface.
As a counter point via science is really good but tries to avoid the deep math as much as possible while explaining the concepts behind it. All the while it’s been pure science and less of the popular topic as a way to introduce the science.
Line go up. That’s all the matters. Every quarter it must go up.
If we have to gut the “machinery” that will make us money tomorrow in order to make it go up today then that’s what we do.
It’s still fantastic. But the tone was different.
They pulled us in with the quirky, and tricked us into learning about space time curvature, spin, Higgs fields and tensors.
The sly dogs.
And if it’s not loud enough put it in a small metal pan or bowl, and place that inside a partially opened dresser drawer. Amplifies it quite a bit in addition to your suggestion to physically get up to turn it off.
Crazy Tuesday… the day we eat at Crazy Joes Taco Palace.
Thanks for the suggestions. I’ll check them out.
Cat: this is a nice place and I like you. I want to make sure you’re eating.
Here, take this
What a mess… sounds like the devs got burned by various Unicode edge cases RTL, etc
Oof. That sounds horrible
Is it because of the lower case Latin æ since it’s technically one character even if two bytes?
Sounds like it’s actually using XSLT or some kind of content validation. Which to be honest sounds like a good practice.
Im so excited. That’s why I’m reading through them again.
Then mistborn, warbreaker, etc.
Rereading the Stormlight archive right now after finishing the last book.
Man I wish I could find another book with that energy. Murderbot diaries has some of the serious/comedic aspect but not at the level of DCC. Same for hitchhikers guide. Close, but not quite the same.
It’s not a waste of time… it’s a waste of space. But it does allow you to “enforce” some schema. Which, very few people use that way and so, as a data store using JSON works better.
Or… we could go back to old school records where you store structs with certain defined lengths in a file.
You know what? XML isn’t looking so bad now.
If you want to break the AI ask instead what regex you should use to parse HTML.
Sounds like they’re running their own LLM instance on googles cloud infrastructure vs using something like OpenAI via API.
From a web dev parlance it makes sense but for marketing it is definitely confusing and they should do better.