His lawyer wasn’t even supposed to be there, that day.

Where?

I don’t think this us v them you’re insinuating at is helpful.

If you want to start criticizing people, maybe look at yourself in the mirror. You’re the only one here being hostile.

You sure that’s been ruled on? Not arguing, only feel like I’ve seen a lot more instances of police violating that than hearing they couldn’t do it.

Edit: my apologies, you’re right. I was able to check into it and see recent rulings. Warrant levels may vary, but they need a warrant.

If i recall correctly, law enforcement can use biometric information to unlock phones without your consent or a warrant.

PIN codes still by consent or warrant only.

“Why not both.”

“Yes.”

This!

Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

Free VPN == you are the product.

You got me there. Now I gotta get a new job.

I like it when people make up statements because they can’t refute what is actually being said.

Nowhere did this person say that.

I should have read one comment down before responding. This is absolutely the correct answer.

The fake communists don’t want to hear them though, so there isn’t really any sort of debate.

Source: banned on lemmygrad.ml and I’m a pretty far leftist.

You can’t bring logic to a bad faith argument!

Yeah… not sure you quite understand that goes against free speech by removing their right to speak about it if a permit is required but the government isn’t granting it… much less that a permit be required for “free speech.”

Saying one thing is happening doesn’t make it mutually exclusive for other things to be happening.

Sorry - forgot the word “knew”. The guy is just bad-faith.

You *knew that would happen one he gaslit whataboutism, didn’t you?

Edit - forgot a word…

Oh absolutely. While I love baseless accusations, accusations are better when it’s obvious.

Edit: and check homies history… it’s pretty obvious.

Found the Russian.

You learned from those same things and make a profit.