The arrest warrant and the 2 additional children were not in the original article

Honestly if there’s an arrest warrant and the dude fled it gets harder to defend a burden of proof that’s hanging on a system that he manages to evade, though we’ve seen people genuinely just going back home and getting a warrant after but let’s put that aside.

On one hand i appreciate the deterrent that publishing his name is to other sex tourists, but on the other if he gets beaten to death because of it, or worse, some guy with the same name - I’m not fond of that either.

All that while honestly there’s already systems in place for fleeting criminals, not sure there’s much benefits feeding his real name to the mob in a very well referenced newspaper.

There’s confusion. I’ve maintained that to me, the goalpost is conviction. I cited an article that’s less damning for sure but I still motivate my goalpost by principles, not examples. It’s simpler to rely on an already established baseline, which is the justice system’s convictions, and I’m okay if that means that sometimes, a very plausibly guilty man benefits from undeserved anonimity

But you know, every time I say that homeowners should indeed face jailtime for shooting a fleeting burglar in the back I face the same people with the same arguments

People like to be tough on crime, but I don’t like people who feel the need to do justice themselves

There’s not much more to say, I just don’t believe in mob justice. If they’re not convinced back there 10 posts ago they won’t be now

“Don’t do justice yourself” was never a popular proposition

I’ve also said that slightly below, so.

He was always probably a pedophile, we’ve read the same article

You still can’t let mobs do the justice

Ill let you simmer that burden of proof comment real quick

I’ve never used archlinux

People who use arch don’t come here they roll their own instance

Iusearch.fyi is speedy and blocks no other instance except the pedo ones so it’s the best if you want a self-defined experience on the fediverse without rolling your own lemmy docker

Or perhaps he was framed? Or extorted by the guy who reported it? Or, he’s just a pedophile. Probably the latter

That’s why we rely on courts and allow people to defend their side of a story

Removed by mod

Not comparable

It’s a matter of principle, pick any of hundreds of examples if you want a comparison

Again, not comparable

Some people

I never said “no matter what he did”

If convicted I don’t care

I just picked the first one when you google “media ruined life”

It’s a matter of principle

There’s hundreds of examples, pick your favorite

My hopes are low, let’s put it like that

But they were also pretty low for Robert Murat, so, I don’t like media vigilantism anymore.

Removed by mod

No I strongly disagree on giving psychoanalysis that much consideration

Besides the fact that psychoanalysis, new wave or not ; jung, freud, lacan, has only been demonstrated to work better than leaving the patient alone on a handful of illnesses and it’s still unclear whether simply letting patients talk and air out their problems could be the main driver of that.

It is fundamentally a discipline that is impermeable to science

I’ve never heard a student tell me they’ve read Watson or Rayner or any of the founders of CBT because scientific disciplines are centered around historical results and not authors. They know about Rayner’s results and it is enough, and if something better comes along later they’ll switch. No one is a Raynerist.

Psychoanalysis has gurus, and the beliefs themselves are built to be unverifiable

I’m tired of lecturers who tell you that if you treat someone with it, it’s proof that it works. And if the patient doesn’t respond to treatment it’s either the patient’s fault or they just need more time, and nothing is ever proof that it doesn’t work. And who are you to question <authority figure> anyway?

If they suddenly start publishing reproduced results in reputable journals that do anything other than being less effective than the current state of the art, then sure, let’s have them beyond history classes. Right now though? It’s a load of bullshit

I’ve had neighbors for 28 years and they’ve never been a significant portion of my problems. Largely nice, mostly indifferent, sometimes annoying

Being close to things, short commutes, no driving and not being lonely though?

Remove any of those and I’m instantly worse off

Not fun fact: 8 out of 10 shrinks in France use psychoanalysis

Only 1 university in the country excludes it from their care curriculum (history modules non-withstanding)

Only country in the world that hasn’t booted that practice off along with argentina

Watch out OP, big funny appreciator over here found your post sub par

I’d say it’s a non sequitur

Which is better in what way exactly?

You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn’t even support encryption support voice?

It doesn’t support having messages received while you were offline

IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.

People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt