Hi I’m Kevin, a tech enthusiast and motorbiker from northern Germany. | https://kevink.dev | Mastodon @kevin@1in1.net | Moto-Pics @x-kev@pixel.tchncs.de

  • 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • Kevin@l.1in1.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlImmutable Operating Systems: Yay or Nay?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use NixOS, which is kind of a middle thing. The OS is generally immutable, except through one central config. This allows to tweak the OS to exactly the way you want it, whilst preventing any accidental changes and allowing atomic rollbacks.

    Learning Nix configuration syntax is a bit of a bump in the road, but once you’ve got that it’s smooth sailing


  • I use it to host one of my self-hosting servers at Hetzner, and I’ve really enjoyed the experience. Especially having the ability to roll back when i mess up is a life saver.

    In my experience NixOS is really stable which makes it perfect for running on a server.


  • honestly it would be better than it is now. currently content is in what we call silos or walled gardens. if my grandma posts to Facebook i can’t see it because I’m not with Facebook.

    If Facebook (/ mEtA) went on the Fediverse, that would also mean exposing any and all content over the ActivityPub standard. Every user can decide themselves if they want to see posts from Facebooks servers, but there would at least be the opportunity to see the content at all.

    Also it would make switching away from big platforms way easier, because why would i stay with Facebook, when i can just switch to e.g. tchncs.de or my own server and keep in touch with all my old contacts.

    TL;DR Big cooperations federating their content silos would be good, that’s why (for the most part) it’s not going to happen