Aesthetics here are chef’s kiss
Aesthetics here are chef’s kiss
It is - it’s a super affirmative position. It takes an extreme position within the sphere it’s trying to criticize to make an exaggerated point to attack. It’s literally a classic strawman.
Your follow up is in the same vein. Its empty rhetoric
These arguments are exactly why people hate vegans. It’s nonsense.
Not only do you jump to an insane straw man. You showcase that you ignore a clear increasing contradiction around your world view and choose reactionary nothing.
If you care about life realize the harder question. If you care about the environment realize clear inefficiencues. Currently, you showcase nothing more than crude thoughtlessness.
If he was using their VPN, they wouldn’t have been able to turn that over according to their own site: https://protonvpn.com/features/no-logs-policy#:~:text=No-logs VPN,lengths%2C or location.
Beating Jews and firing rockets at Jews for the reason of them being Jewish is antisemitic. Despite Hamas absolutely being antisemitic, launching rockets at an occupying state killing your people is not. Americans criticizing their government for giving money to a foreign etnostate attempting genocide, also not antisemitic.
Hope that cleared things up fascist!
I’ll give the couple in the article this, I know many of the it’s okay until it affects us types and none of them changed their voting habits
Why do I feel like you live on colonized land?
So this piece doesn’t source any evidence that it was used and ignores the literal fact that later investigations by Amnesty didn’t find credible evidence of use as a military base and the massive Israeli misinformation campaign on that front: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_military_use_of_al-Shifa_hospital#:~:text=During the Israel–Hamas war,Hamas and hospital administrators denied.
But yeah let’s justify Israel bombing away access to medical care to people forced into a small, war torn area because fuck Palestinians I guess.
Yeah he’s a creep and so are you
Tautological statements are true so assume you meant bad use of tautology
Not a scientist but the article seems to mean that they checked that the tools themselves had no defects giving incorrect measurements.
This comment seems to be questioning the methodology of how we measure the rate of expansion so tackles a different aspect of the conversation.
But that’s about as much as I can contribute haha
Many have already touched on this, but you hit the nail on the head with the third paragraph. Always smart to prepare but any attempt to use this to reduce workers will go horribly. Saving isn’t crazy in this regard but wouldn’t plan on it being long term until LLMs can become less expensive, have better reasoning and most importantly have at all better performance on longer context windows without impact on performance. These aren’t easy solves, they brush up on fundamentals limits of the tech
If you are truly feeling super anxious, feel free to dm me. Have released gen AI tech though admittedly only in that space for about a year and a half and… Ur good. Happy to get in depth about it but genuinely you are good for so many reasons that I’d be happy to expand upon.
Main point though for programmers will be it’s expensive as fuck to get any sort of process going that will produce complex systems of code. And frankly I’m being a bit idealistic there. That’s without even considering the amount of time. Love AI, but hype is massively misleading the reality of the tech.
Cool so you respond to a comment responsive to the original comment with a non responsive “Shut the fuck up”. Yet you think that not only are you are in a good spot to shout bot army but clearly project barking like a shrill dog like that isn’t what you are.
Also you missed saying a re-worded ‘u triggered?’… Be better
I’m gonna assume by not pro-Isreal you mean triggered by any implications Israel and the US are complicit in genocide
Lol so basically admitting you are unable to find any information and have resorted to a call to authority of some made up sources you" had" access to or def 100% "experienced
Btw why the fuck would anyone believe anonymous information from someone reluctant to back it. You can say literally anything but that doesn’t make it grounded dip shit
What a telling statement consisting of only weird fabrications of your mind lol
Can you name a single source showcasing that this is even remotely true and has ever been even considered as a reason?
Common thing said but pretty stupid. Most scientific discoveries are grounded in figuring out anecdotal phenomenon. This is even more true for social sciences