The Oscar-winning Hollywood actor cries as he is cleared of all charges at London's Southwark Crown Court.
  • Syndic@feddit.de
    72·
    1 year ago

    You are still allowed to dislike innocent people.

    Just a small correction. Being not proven guilty doesn’t proves innocence. It just means that the accusation couldn’t be proven in court. That’s the price we pay for our justice system which tries to keep wrong convictions as small as possible, quite a few guilty people will walk free.

    And I think in this case a guilty person walks free.

          • Rom@lemmy.world
            22·
            1 year ago

            Do you have proof these accusations were false? Remember, a not guilty verdict only means the evidence presented was insufficient for a conviction, and does not mean the accusations were not real.

              • Rom@lemmy.world
                11·
                1 year ago

                But in the case the original user clearly stated it was their opinion, not a fact. Individuals are allowed to have opinions of another person’s guilt, even if it differs from that of a jury.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        26·
        1 year ago

        No. But with these many accusations I really don’t need that to make an educated guess.

        And nothing prevents me from doing so since I can’t do shit about that fucker beside not watching his movies.

          • Syndic@feddit.de
            7·
            1 year ago

            So when a certain number of accusations against a person is reached that makes the accusations true?

            No, but much more likely.

            You really think he gives a shit if you watch his movies? Cute but please keep in mind the dude is super fucking rich and his estimated worth is about 70.000.000$.

            Yes? That’s my point!