• aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    ·
    5 months ago

    Archuleta himself, though, has a history of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. He previously blamed LGBTQ+ individuals for the Club Q shooting and said that queer people are “groomers” – or child sex abusers – a negative stereotype that has been used to justify hatred and discrimination.

    Bruh.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, no. You see, he’s just one of the good ones. If the rest of them were just like him, there wouldn’t be an issue.

        /s

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not necessarily? The dude is gay, LGBT+ and queer covers a lot more than gay. Maybe he just hates the other ones.

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s weirdly a lot of fractures within the LGBTQ+ community, there’s a joke that the letters are “in order of preference” and quite a lot of the gay community doesn’t recognise trans people, or thinks Bi folks are just gay but won’t admit it and things like that.

            An ex of mine was bi and I got exposed to a lot of this shit because of the amount of shit she got from some of her lesbian friends over dating a man. It really shocked me because it’s completely against your own interests to become the very thing that’s opressed you and your kin, yet here we are - gay republicans.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah you can pick a side and be hated by the other side or you can stay in the middle and be hated by both. Tribalism 101.

          • Plopp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why are you asking me that question? Ask the dude in the article, he’s the one who believes it.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe he just hates the other ones

          living over 40 years as a gay man has taught me plenty to hate the other ones too. lol

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not a bad take. Identity is definitely a spectrum of sorts. We all have limits to our acceptance level.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Something to think about is that there are men who see a benefit to gayness being something you can be social ostracized for, because it enables them to have gay sex freely with the knowledge that if there partners ever tell anyone about it they’ll suffer repercussions.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Sounds deranged. If it was NOT socially ostracized they would NOT need to rely on the partner being ostracized.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I know a hard republican pedophile that used their rhetoric around trans people to justify to their victims that people calling him out are just bigots