The homeowner who fatally shot a 20-year-old University of South Carolina student who tried to enter the wrong home on the street he lived on Saturday morning will not face charges because the incident was deemed “a justifiable homicide” under state law, Columbia police announced Wednesday.

Police said the identity of the homeowner who fired the gunshot that killed Nicholas Donofrio shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday will not be released because the police department and the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office determined his actions were justified under the state’s controversial “castle doctrine” law, which holds that people can act in self-defense towards “intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of themselves and others.”

  • Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No one was actually breaking into their home though. Literally nothing would have happened to that home owner if he had been less trigger-happy and tried to comminucate with the kid.

    • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Donofrio repeatedly knocked, banged and kicked on the front door “while manipulating the door handle” while trying to enter the home.

      Donofrio broke a glass window on the front door “and reached inside to manipulate the doorknob”

    • KiloGex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He broke the glass and tried to open the door from the inside. If I were inside that house, I’d certainly feel threatened.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But he literally broke a window and reached around to open the door from the inside. After trying to kick the door in.

      It’s a tragedy, but the homeowner was 100% justified.

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is completely incorrect and shows you didn’t read the article. The guy physically was breaking the door open.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is you can’t judge people’s actions on what we know after the fact, you have to look at what the person knew in the moment, and for the residents, it sure seemed like someone was breaking into their house, and it’s not reasonable to expect to have a dialogue with a burglar.