• raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    So these children are driven to work due to poverty right? So isn’t the answer to try to address that rather than to say “stop using cocoa harvested by child labor?” Like I’m totally pro-non-child-labor-cocoa, but wouldn’t the kids just get other jobs then?

    • spriteblood@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      A good start to fixing the poverty is if companies making obscene amounts of money from their labor start fairly paying people in these areas.

      • P1r4nha@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is why I’m buying chocolate made in Africa, rather than chocolate made from beans from Africa. That way the value is generated there and not here.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because, being from Africa, they are immune to abusing these kids? They can still source from these farms, no matter where your money ends up.

          • P1r4nha@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s not about child abuse, it’s about not making enough money so they need their children to help out. If they get a fair salary, they don’t need to exploit their kids for labor.

    • Maxx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s not an either-or situation. Companies should still be criticized and stopped from exploiting children.

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, and this is a vestige of the destabilization of African nations by white colonial powers to have and sell enslaved people. What boggles my mind is that paying a living wage to workers would increase the price of Mars chocolate slightly if at all (corporate profits could eat the difference) but the people with the power to make those decisions are like “nope! We could get even more profits by paying less for raw materials!” so they seek and/or create even more disenfranchised workers. Doesn’t get more disenfranchised than a 5 year old that has to go to work to help the family make ends meet, but I’m sure the corporate overlords are cooking something up as we speak.

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      their parents also work harvesting cocoa. The reason they are poor despite being working a lot is that they are not paid enough for their work… by Mars (or Nestle, Mondelez, etc)

    • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      That would imply that first world nations empower them, not engage in societal subterfuge via overt and covert subjugation tactics.