Scientists marvel at the fossilised head of an underwater 'killing machine' from the Jurassic.

The skull of a colossal sea monster has been extracted from the cliffs of Dorset’s Jurassic Coast.

It belongs to a pliosaur, a ferocious marine reptile that terrorised the oceans about 150 million years ago.

The 2m-long fossil is one of the most complete specimens of its type ever discovered and is giving new insights into this ancient predator.

The skull will be featured in a special David Attenborough programme on BBC One on New Year’s Day.

  • rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social
    15·
    11 months ago

    I wonder how many other skulls like this protruded from the cliffs, terrorizing seafarers of days gone by? Another possible contribution to our tales of the sea perhaps?

    What an amazing find.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      33·
      11 months ago

      It went extinct 150 million years ago so I don’t think it can have possibly bothered mariners of the past.

  • kellyaster@kbin.social
    11·
    11 months ago

    It’s hard to believe how well it’s preserved. They’re never this complete! It sounds like they might look for the rest of the skeleton, which will be exposed and lost to erosion anyway if it is there. If we’re lucky, we’ll also find clues about its eating habits, which isn’t out of the realm of probability considering how intact they found the skull. Truly remarkable, I really want to see that upcoming Attenborough documentary.

  • wolfylow@lemmy.world
    6·
    11 months ago

    Steve Etches will put the skull on display next year at his museum in Kimmeridge - the Etches Collection.

    I love that they’re going to display this in the local museum!

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    53·
    11 months ago

    So if these marine reptiles could exist off Dorset’s Coast, could there be such a creature living still in Loch Ness? The one photo that has become famous sure looks like this kind of a creature. Or could it even survive in a closed lake system? Just pondering - this is an awesome discovery!

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      12·
      11 months ago

      For a loch ness monster type creature to exist it would truly need to be supernatural.

      If there were only one it would need to be practically ageless and have survived since these creatures roamed the earth millions of years ago.

      Otherwise you’ll have to have at least two creatures in Loch Ness for the entire time to maintain a lineage throughout that time, making it twice as likely to have been discovered

      If you follow the rules of genetics the creature would likely be horribly deformed and riddled with genetic diseases if that were the case.

      To avoid that you would probably need a population of 50-100 creatures within the loch ness in order to sustain a somewhat viable population.

      It’s very unlikely that with how much attention has gone on, 50-100+ of those creatures would go undiscovered, let alone the sustenance needed to sustain that size of population.

      So no, unless it’s a single supernatural creature it’s pretty much impossible I would say.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        3·
        11 months ago

        We’re finding more and more bizarre sea creatures in the ocean depths all the time. The thing is, the ocean’s environment (until recently) hasn’t changed that much over millions of years. So a prehistoric creature COULD theoretically still exist without having to evolve much at all down there.

        Look at the Coelecanth…scientists really believed it was extinct for millions of years, and then a live specimen was caught by African Shark hunters not too long ago. And that thing really LOOKS primitive. I saw the specimin in a preservation tank at a museum in San Francisco, and it was jaw-dropping. I’ve never seen a creature that primitive, with hairy fins and scales the size of dinner plates. It was truly awesome and kind of scary.

        So it’s healthy to be skeptical but also I think it’s important to be a little unsure and open minded.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        31·
        11 months ago

        Oh yeah I realize that, I mean I’m not saying I truly believe (or do I) that there is such a thing as a Loch Ness creature. I guess I’d have to be nuts to believe there could by cryptozoological oddities out there like a Mothman or a Yeti.

        I guess I would pull a Mulder and say, “I want to believe.” Or do I. I’ve been in places where I’ve seen some things I couldn’t and wouldn’t ever try to explain. And I know others wouldn’t believe it anyway. Until it happens to you, and you see it yourself, you can’t believe such things could exist…

        But it’s the same way with Santa, if you think about it. I believe it because, I want to believe. And I get what you’re saying about population probability - if one such creature exists, others like it must also exist (and we’d probably have more proof by now).

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      4·
      11 months ago

      I mean, if it’s too big to swim out of the Dochgarrot lock then it’d be easy to detect. If it isn’t then what’s keeping it in the lake instead of swimming out past Inverness and out into the Moray Firth?

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        6·
        11 months ago

        It doesn’t like Inverness it made the mistake of walking though the Ferry. After that straight back to the lock and never to the big city again. Plus it found Inverness Castle not that interesting.